What’s Hot: Value for money buying, straight-line power, a classier interior.
What’s Not: Traction issues, squeezy seats.
X-FACTOR: Now with an interior update , the Focus ST delivers plenty of kilowatts-per-dollar.
Vehicle Style: Small performance hatch
Price: $38,990 plus on-road costs
Engine/trans: 184kW/360Nm 2.0 litre turbo petrol 4cyl | 6spd man
Fuel consumption listed: 7.3 l/100km | tested: 12.5 l/100km
OVERVIEW
Back in May we gave the updated-for-2015 Focus ST a day-long strap along some tasty Gippslandian roads.
It reminded us then of Ford’s prowess when it comes to making fast front-drivers.
Editor Tim O’Brien described it as “effortlessly quick”, but often performance cars can fall a little flat once you put them on dull, boring roads like, say, those between your home and your office.
Is it effortlessly comfortable? Is it effortlessly driveable? We borrowed the keys for a week to find out.
THE INTERIOR
- Standard equipment: Keyless entry/ignition, dual-zone climate control, leather/cloth upholstery, Recaro front seats, cruise control, reverse parking camera, trip computer.
- - Infotainment: Sync2 with 8-inch colour touchscreen, satellite navigation, voice control, Bluetooth phone/audio connectivity, USB/RCA audio inputs, CD/AM/FM headunit
- - Luggage capacity: 316 litres minimum
You may want to exhale before you drop yourself into the Focus ST’s Recaro front seats.
They’re awfully snug, like, awfully snug. And while I like to think of myself as a modest chap, let me tell you this: I ain’t fat, it’s the seats that are the problem.
But they do hold you in tightly, and that’s a great asset for a performance car. They’re also, surprisingly, not that hard to get in and out of.
Once you’re in though, you’re in. There’s precious little room to shift around.
Ford’s ergonomic re-work of the Focus ST’s interior is a huge improvement on the previous model.
The 8-inch colour touchscreen of the Sync2 infotainment system is far easier on the eyes than the postage stamp-sized one it replaces, and the centre stack buttons are arranged more neatly.
The cupholders are also larger and now hidden under a roller shutter, and the handbrake has been moved to a more conventional position beside the driver’s seat.
The steering wheel is also new, with new contouring and better button placement.
Bar some trim material changes, the rest of the cabin carries over. Rear seat space is good (though under-thigh support is lacking), however the boot measures 316 litres with the rear seats up - sub-par for the class.
ON THE ROAD
- 184kW/360Nm 2.0 litre turbo petrol engine inline four
- Six--speed manual, front wheel drive
- Suspension: MacPherson strut front, independent multi-link rear.
- Brakes: Front 320mm, rear 271mm. Sliding calipers
With 184kW of power and 360Nm of torque, the Focus ST has some of the biggest muscles at this price point.
The WRX eclipses it for power with its 197kW 2.0 litre flat-four, but the Focus has 10Nm more torque (and it’s available lower in the rev range too, from just 2000rpm).
The WRX’s traction advantage sees it zip to 100km/h in six seconds but the front-drive Focus isn’t far behind, hitting triple-digits in just 6.2 seconds. That’s damn quick for a $39k hatchback.
But as we found out over a succession of damp Melbourne days, moisture really hinders the Focus ST.
There’s no limited-slip differential between those front wheels, and its “torque vectoring” traction/stability control system struggles to keep the wheels rotating at the same speed once the road gets a bit slippy.
Accelerate too aggressively and you get wheelspin and axle tramp, with a side serving of torque steer.
The dearly-departed Focus RS put its power down better, but that car had a tricky multi-link front suspension - the Focus ST only has conventional MacPherson struts.
The traction issue is also evident in corners.
While the Focus ST has razor-sharp steering and a lovely chassis balance that easily rotates on throttle lift-off (you’ll want to hit the Sport button to exploit that), it struggles to put power down on corner exit.
A proper limited-slip differential would transform the Focus ST into a proper segment-leader and we were hoping to see one added as part of the MY15 update. Sadly, it wasn’t to be.
Also, for day-to-day driving, some may be deterred by the absence of an automatic transmission.
Those comfortable enough to change their own gears will, however, enjoy a precise shift and a clutch that, though heavy, is easy to modulate.
It’s not a car you want to be stuck in a traffic jam in, though. Stop-start conditions will quickly see your left leg tire of pushing that heavy clutch pedal.
The Focus ST is a thirsty beast too. Driven with vigor it returned an average of 12.5 l/100km, against Ford’s claim of 7.3 l/100km
SAFETY
ANCAP rating: 5-Stars - this model scored 34.17 out of 37 possible points.
Safety features: Stability control (switchable), traction control (switchable), ABS, EBD, brake assist, hill start assist and a reversing camera are standard on the Focus ST.
Passengers are protected by six airbags: front, front side and full-length curtain.
RIVALS TO CONSIDER
At just under $39k, the Focus ST’s most serious rival is the Subaru WRX. If practicality is low on the priority list, the Mini Cooper S is good buying at $36,950.
Spend a bit over $40k and the supremely well-sorted Volkswagen Golf GTI and Renault Megane RS 265 become available, and all are fine alternatives in this segment.
TMR VERDICT | OVERALL
The Focus ST scores big for its price, equipment list and power, but is compromised when it comes to comfort and day-to-day driveability.
There’s also room for its performance to improve. It’s no sloth, but it struggles to put all of its power down neatly and that hurts its appeal as a hot hatch.
But you get plenty of go for your dough, and those prepared to put up with a heavy clutch, tight seats and firm suspension will find the Focus ST to be a very capable performance car.
MORE: Focus ST: 2015 Price & Features
MORE: COMPARED: Focus ST, Cooper S, WRX, Golf GTI
MORE: Ford Oz Accelerating New Model Launches
MORE: Focus ST | Hot Hatches | Performance Cars
- Interested in buying FORD FOCUS? Visit our FORD FOCUS showroom for more information.
6 Comments
Not a big fan then, Tony? :) Agree that there are compromises involved here, and it won't be for everyone...no doubt as a commuter it is much easier and more comfortable to drive a softer-sprung auto. But so long as a car has some character I'd always choose a manual. They're fine for commuting too...and the payoff is that a weekend drive might be something to savour rather than effectively being just another commute on a different road. The lack of traction IS a problem though...especially if it doesn't communicate its limits well. Didn't strike it when I test drove a pre-update ST a while back...but then again I couldn't drive it as enthusiastically as I'd like either :(
All very accurate. Traction is the ST's Achilles heel, that being said in a straight line it is blindingly quick. I have slingshot'd 2 new WRX's in second gear when traction is available, and the WRX doesn't come close to the STs features at that price point. You will be spending near 50k on a GTI or WRX to match. The creator of the ST who was poached by VW said you cannot put a decent DCT in a car at that price point and the GTI is proof of that with a lot of durability problems. I also stayed glued to the rear of a Gen IV SS ute under heavy acceleration at highway speed, impressive for a 2 litre. Compared to my XR6 Turbo, the ST loses next to nothing in straight line speed and anhilates it on the bends, just make sure you use top end tyres????. The 320mm Volvo front rotors are awesome stoppers as well. As I have mentioned before, I have had nearly 100k of faultless hard driving from this car.
What's your fuel usage like Roger. I've had mine since release and have done 50,000km and my fuel readouts started out on 9.2 and it's now on 8.8. I certainly wouldn't say I drive sedately either. As for the review I guess ride comfort is a personal taste. I used to drive a 350z and loved the firmness. I then went to the focus ST and felt the same firmness as was elated. I was then informed the front suspension chocks were left in accidentally. After that I was a bit disappointed it wasn't firmer. The boot room is the other one that boggles my mind. During the last year I have driven to the airport with my bags in the boot. Flown to my destination and then hired a car (first a Commodore, second time a Camry) just to find I couldn't put all my luggage into the boot. I've mentioned here before I bought a chest freezer and took it home in the back. It fit all the baby gear when my daughter was young (including the Strider 4 stroller). I remember trying to fit the stroller into other cars while deciding on the ST and there were very few it fit in. Mazda 3 - nope, Subaru Impreza - nope, i30 - yes.
I have varied between 7.6 on a freeway biased run to currently 10.2 on pure city driving. Not bad as the XR6 drank about 30% more on the same runs. My mates SS ute was sucking 18on the city run. I just had my brakes done, beware as the Internet specs from DBA are incorrect. I got suspicious and got the Ford specs which don't match. I was correct and my mechanic discovered they are Volvo rotors and rear calipers, bespoke Ford front calipers. You can only get front pads from Ford, the others won't fit. The other gripe is the clutch isn't really up to it. I was considering getting the COBB tuning done, but that ramps torque up 35%, and the clutch already struggles. I have had clouds of clutch shifting full throttle into 2nd. No aftermarket clutch either????
Just another car with a rock hard suspension??? why bother :-/