Sometimes you have to be sensible. You have to do stuff that pleases your accountant more than it pleases you. You even have to think like an "accountant". (This is an interesting exercise in itself, if you find seeing things only in black and white interesting.)
Should you decide to start thinking like an accountant, and not like the complete rabbit you’ve made a practice of until now—your next car won’t be a V8. It might not even be a ‘six’. Because with fuel pegging along at a million or so ducats a litre, it’s not sensible, fiscally speaking, to pour great wads of the hard-earned into the fuel tank each week.
It’s more sensible to buy a four cylinder, or even a hybrid. But, of course, for some of you, this creates a problem. I know, because I know quite a bit about rabbits (having been acquainted with one for quite some time now). I know that there are some of you who would rather kill yourselves slowly with a fork than drive a ‘family four’ or, worse, much worse, a hybrid.
So what do you do if you’re not quite up to death by fork, but you feel compelled to ‘be sensible’?
You buy an ‘oiler’, friends—a modern turbo diesel.
Something like the new Mondeo TDCi. It’s a very sensible car: you can snag one for just $37,990 plus on-roads, and it runs on the smell of an oily rag. Under the bonnet, in case your accountant asks (and you won't even have to lie), is an advanced 2.0 litre Duratorq four-cylinder common-rail turbo diesel engine. It’s a very well-proven unit and produces 96kW and peak torque of 320Nm from an un-fussed 1750rpm.
It’s the torque figure that is important here: 320Nm. That’s the kind of figure you might once have expected from your average V8. Ok, it doesn’t bellow like a V8, or shred rubber from the line like a ‘bent vee’ on the nail; but once moving, the twisting force of all that torque pushes things along nicely.
Very nicely indeed. There’s something about forced induction and a modern diesel that becomes a bit intoxicating. What’s more, you can wring its neck and the effect on the fuel consumption is… nothing... nil. No effect, well, almost none. Diesels are good like that, they just love hard graft.
Here at TMR, we were mightily impressed with the Mondeo TDCi; so impressed that we thought we’d better find something to compare it with: a benchmark, a standard against which we could make a meaningful comparison.
That means it was time for a ‘COMPARO’. (Wooo, now TMR is really cooking.)
So we got the new SAAB TTiD. Now this is not to be confused with its lesser sibling, the TiD. No, the TTiD is a much more serious set of wheels. It is the first diesel Saab to carry the coveted Aero badge and comes with not one turbo, but two – a little one to get things going, and a big one to chip in when things are really happening.
And that’s why the badge gets an extra ‘T’ – TTiD.
Mated to either a six-speed manual or six-speed automatic transmission, the 1.9-litre, 16-valve two-stage turbo engine produces a grunt-filled 132 kW and 400 Nm of torque (in manual trim, 370Nm for the auto) while returning combined consumption of an extremely sensible 5.7 l/100km for the manual Sport Sedan, and 6.8 l/100km for the auto.
On the face of it then, the Saab holds a considerable power advantage over the Ford. The second point of departure from the Mondeo is in the price; the Saab Aero TTiD retails at $65,100 for the auto, and $62,600 for the manual. That’s around $25,000 more than the Mondeo TDCi (and you can do a lot with $25,000).
So, your accountant will be asking, is the Saab $25,000-better than the Ford and which car would be the ‘more sensible’ purchase?


ShareThis


2008 Saab 9-3 Aero TTiD
Ford Mondeo earns five star Euro NCAP rating
2008 Saab Aero spy photos







Comments
2 years ago 0 points
2 years ago 0 points
2 years ago 0 points
laurie
2 years ago 0 points
Funny you say that as I have just got one and agree with your report BUT there are many,many items on a Mondeo that are extras on others took it for a drive to Kangaroo Valley and Macaquarie Pass today and it was sensational that diesel is punchy and VERY easy on the wallet love to see the 2.2L 400NM the Poms get
ps the Bluetooth and Voice Control is a bargain and she has a very sexy voice :)
laurie
2 years ago 0 points
My last experience with a saab gave me brusied kidneys.
2 years ago 0 points
Interesting thing though Conquistador... don't believe all you hear on Top Gear (Clarkson knows he's nuts): the Vectra is not as underdone - I think Clarkson calls it "floppy" - as some would have you believe.
In normal UK trim, with a 90 kW 1.8 litre Family 1 Ecotec engine, or even with the 2.0 litre 129 kW turbocharged Family II donk, the Vectra's GM Epsilon platform was up to the mark - even when under the whip for the occasional fast-blast.
(Er... better scrub the 1.8 there: "blast" is really overstating things - that donk would struggle with the proverbial greasy stick).
Now when Vauxhall put an Aussie GM turbo-charged 2.8 litre V6 with 205kW and 356Nm in the nose of the Vectra however - without adequately re-engineering the chassis for those extra ergs - that's when things started to go astray.
But the Saab TTiD is a much friendlier unit (and even in their dark days, Saab engineers have produced some more than reasonable steers). Things are working pretty well with the TTiD and 'that' chassis. And, at just 1.9 litres, there's not a lot of engine sitting over the nose: that may be the secret.
Funny thing about motoring writers is that they play follow the leader: if someone further up the food chain takes the hatchet to a car, then a bunch of others will slip into a feeding frenzy. Not many trust themselves to buck the trend.
There are not enough who can translate what they feel at the wheel into sensible comment about what's really happening underneath, and where the engineering is actually failing.
This is not to say we won't get it wrong sometimes, or even a lot. We will. But we won't play follow the leader.
The Insider
2 years ago 0 points
2 years ago 0 points
For the same reason to the uniniated an Astra can feel "sportier" than a Mazda 3. but ask the car to turn in, handle a bit of off camber with a bump or two and you can immediately tell the difference.
Besides i think the saab actually proves the point. Seems they binned the Twist beam rear end of the Vectra and put in a multilink. Not exactly a glowing endorsement of the vectra from within GM's ranks now is it?
2 years ago 0 points
2 years ago 0 points
2 years ago 0 points
Conqestador - Don't forget the post 2005 Vectras are slightly modified and are different to the earlier version, far nicer to drive. I have a 2004 Vectra 3.0CDTi wagon and also drive the later 1.9CDTi (hire cars) weekly and theres a noticeable difference. The insiders right ignore the gung ho Clarkson (can't drive smoothly for toffies) comments, yep the car was dull to look at but its much better now. Pity you Aussies gave up on it in 2005, guess you voted with your wallets.
2 years ago 0 points
A new ad for the Mondeo wouldn't go astray though.
6 months ago 0 points
1. The blue tooth does not work properly. I can not tune any AM radio stations with it. The dealer told me to use a high pitched voice. When I did this it worked. Nice Job Ford.
2. The air conditioner turns off when the car is not in motion. This is very frustrating when I am stuck in traffic on a hot day.
3. Car has gone into safe mode twice requiring it to be towed back to the dealership for repairs. They tell me this is due to an ABS sensor failure.
4. The paint is changing color. It started with a tennis ball sized blotch which is slowly taking over the whole front bumper. Ford have offered to have my car go to a panel beater for the car to be resprayed.
I only have 6000kms on the clock. Perhaps I should have spent another 26K and received a more reliable car.
Frustrated Mondeo owner.
6 months ago 0 points