2010 Holden Statesman AFM And SIDI Road Test Review

By Tony O'Kane | 
Jan 8, 2010
ShareThis

2010 Holden Statesman AFM and SIDI Road Test Review

WITH A STRENGTHENING TREND among new car buyers to downsize, it is no bed of roses in the large car segment.

Sure, some larger luxury brands, notably Audi and BMW, would seem to have been insulated from the move to smaller thriftier cars. But others have not fared so well - Holden's WM Statesman and Caprice had a tough year in 2009.

According to VFACTS figures, the Caprice was down 11.3 percent in 2009 compared to 2008, while the Statesman was down a hefty 67.6 percent. That will have alarmed Holden's bean counters, particularly with a resiliently high Aussie dollar compounding things.

But it's not yet time to ring the bells on Holden's luxury warriors. The Statesman is a big car, sure, but it is also stylish, serenly comfortable and - as we discovered with both SIDI and AFM models -  commendably fuel-efficient.

Like the rest of Holden's VE/WM range, the Statesman has recently had a mechanical revamp designed to boost fuel economy and, in the case of the base V6, power and torque.

2010_holden_statesman_road-test-review_07

The updates include two 'firsts' for Holden - the first application of cylinder deactivation technology in a V8 engine, and the first use of direct-injection in a locally-built product.

The V6 model also benefits from a newer, more efficient transmission. Of course, in a tough and getting tougher market segment, the Statesman has to match it with the best from overseas.

So, how good is it and how much has it benefited from its under-the-skin makeover?

Styling

2010_holden_statesman_road-test-review_13 The big changes with both the AFM and SIDI models occur under the skin, and as such there’s nothing new to report style-wise.

That’s both good and bad: good because the WM Statesman always did a nice job of projecting an image of businesslike authority, and not so good because the shape is perhaps, by now, a little too familiar.

BMW’s 7 Series, Benz’s S-Class and Lexus’s LS have all either been recently facelifted or completely revamped, and although they occupy a much higher price bracket than the Statesman, it makes the Holden one of the older designs in the large luxury segment.

But while it may be starting to sport a few crow’s feet and grey hairs, the Statesman still looks every bit as dignified as it did when it launched in 2006.

2010_holden_statesman_road-test-review_10

The large headlamp clusters, big rectangular grille, prominent Statesman ‘wreath’ emblem and a chrome bezel on the lower air intake are hallmarks of the model.

Its close cousin the Caprice incorporates similar elements, however it does away with the Statesman’s three horizontal chrome slats within the grille and flaunts a sportier front bumper.

The foglight lenses are ringed in chrome, and more brightwork is applied to the beltline moulding and over the tops of the door frames. A band of chrome runs parallel to the lower edges of the doors and rear bumper, while a thick chrome strip spans the gap between each tail light.

There’s little flamboyance or styling excess in the Statesman’s lines, but it stands out in traffic thanks to its sheer bulk and dignified presence. The Statesman is enormous; its side profile the best view from which to appreciate its dimensions.

2010_holden_statesman_road-test-review_15

Although based on the VE’s platform, there’s little carry over. The front doors and windscreen are shared with the VE, with everything rearward of the B-pillar elongated.

The rear doors are lengthened to ease entry and exit, and the boot space is longer and larger. Ten-spoke 17-inch alloy wheels are standard, although wheels up to 20 inches in diameter can be had for a little extra outlay.

Interior

While the exterior is unique to the WM, the interior styling is familiar.

The centre console, front door cards, steering wheel and lower dash plastics are the same shape as those used by the Calais, however the dashboard, instrument binnacle, instrument cluster and centre-stack are unique to the WM.

2010_holden_statesman_road-test-review_26_interior

The front seat cushions are broad and soft, although don’t expect much in the way of lateral support. The leather is pleasing to touch, but the seatback seems to be unnaturally firm just below the shoulders.

interiorThe driver’s seating position is good though, with an eight-way electrically adjusting seat (four-way on the passenger seat) and a steering wheel that adjusts for both reach and rake. Visibility is hindered by the WM’s thickish A-pillar, but otherwise outward visibility is decent.

Although the front of the cabin may seem like familiar territory, the rear most definitely shares little with the Commodore range. ‘Abundant’ doesn’t even begin to describe the amount of legroom that is on offer to back seat passengers, and a wide cabin means there’s plenty of room to accommodate three adults across the rear bench.


Comments

  • Matt J [reply]
    7 months ago -1 points
    BORING. Just by putting a Green Badge on the back makes this a much greener car.
  • Paddy [reply]
    7 months ago -1 points
    BORING. Overpriced Germans with overpriced technology can do so much better, I'm sure people ARE willing to pay more if they get more...

    Diesels satisfy treehuggers better, and performance-oriented petrols satisfy powerheads. Not a greenie petrol engine , boring symmetrical design and yucky disgusting seats. Holden you're going to lose this one if you don't get it right
  • Muse [reply]
    7 months ago -1 points
    BORING. The wheels look very downmarket. The bum still sits too high. Overall it's pretty understated.
  • Matt J [reply]
    7 months ago -1 points
    The Czech's should be giving Skoda Supurbs to the Governments in Aus - more space perhaps? Better looking, Lower emissions and engine sizes! Hello. I know in Perth, the only Skoda dealership approached Chauffeur companies in getting some Supurbs in their companies.... but not sure how that went down? :(
  • Matt J [reply]
    7 months ago -1 points
    Oh, and what's with Australian cars having gear down as forward and gear up as back!? Makes no sense...

    Oh and Toyota seem to be giving Local Governments their cars in attempt to lower politician's Co2 emissions..... and saves us Tax payers around $2k a year...
  • kds [reply]
    7 months ago 1 points
    Matt J, the was the Australian built cars have their tiptronic shifts is the absoloute correct way, just look as sequential gearbox racing cars. The way you move the lever equates with the inertia of the vehicle accelerating (you being pushed back in your seat, pull back to go faster) or decelerating (vehicle leaning forward as it slows you pushing gear lever forward too).

    I cant stand driving stupid Asian cars with their kakky tiptronic shift patterns
  • Matt J [reply]
    7 months ago -1 points
    VAG's DSG gearbox's go the 'kakky' way and they're beautiful! And not Asian either.
  • Luke Skywalker [reply]
    7 months ago 1 points
    I agree with kds, I much prefer forward to go down and back to go up. It feels more natural to me. I drove a golf with DSG this week and although the gearbox is better than in my beemer, the direction of the tiptronic felt all wrong.

    By the way, the inside of the Statesman doesn't feel remotely luxurious. Hard plastics, big gaps between plastics - of various widths too. Nasty! Still, more space inside than the Death Star (and I should know, I've been on it!)
  • Nightshifter [reply]
    7 months ago 1 points
    kds is right. It's awkward to have to push forward to upshift when accelerating hard and your body is pushed back. DSGs are done that way doesn't automatically mean it's the right/natural way.
  • Cheeseburger [reply]
    7 months ago 1 points
    "Hard plastics, big gaps between plastics - of various widths too. Nasty!"

    Couldn't have said it better myself. It really is outrageous. All you're paying for is space. And a rubbish automatic.
  • Josh [reply]
    7 months ago -1 points
    Holden is so out of touch for what their customers want. Instead of producing thse barges and importing rubish from Korea, Invest in the Opel models. Australians want fuel efficent, quality build, value for money, safe cars (VW, Skoda, Toyota..) Hence why every second car on the road is a Golf! VW is providing a complete package.. Yes it may cost a little more.. but people are prepared pay for if they are getting a quality product! Holden does not provide this!
  • kds [reply]
    7 months ago 1 points
    Josh, you're talking rubbish. The Cruze well outsells the Golf. I'm not saying the Cruze is a better car, sales do not make a car automatically better. But it does prove (and so did the Astra) that people will not pay a high price for a small Holden.

    And VW & Skoda are not good value for money. Perhaps if they dropped their prices $5000 then they would be good value.
  • Matt J [reply]
    7 months ago 0 points
    kds, can you show me facts on sales re Cruze out selling the Golf.

    Can we perhaps say Golf sales from when the car went on sale ARE/WERE better than what/how the Korean Cruze sales are going since it, GMH; starting selling the Korean Cruze.
  • Deltoid [reply]
    7 months ago -1 points
    Hey Matt J, according to VFACTS Holden sold over 1900 Cruzes last month, compared to around 800 Golfs.

    I think you'll find that trend has been pretty consistent since both models launched. The Cruze is easily the more popular car.
  • Josh [reply]
    7 months ago -1 points
    I'm sorry but the VW Golf is the 3rd largest selling car on the planet. (First is the Corolla & second is the Ford F-Series) At no point does GM appear in the top 10... Hence GM Chapter 11.. VW purchasing shares in other Automotive Companies! Give me a break people!
  • Watto [reply]
    7 months ago 0 points
    I can't get past small things like the cheap cop-out of its "non-intrusive" boot hinges. They are an awful exposed scissor type hinge like an old Cortinas bonnet.

    Even the Falcon has had real non-intrusive hinges (they go up into the C-pillar) since at least AU.

    While I haven't tried a WM Statesman, I recently drove it's VT equivalent with the supercharged 3.8 V6.

    Drivers position seemed awfully cramped for a large LWB car. The space in the back was very impressive. Very comfortable ride.

    The supercharged V6 was extremely unimpressive. I guess the extra weight made it seem no better than an NA SWB VT.
  • Dave [reply]
    7 months ago 0 points
    A great car, I love the Statesman - I have an older WH. The new models look great. Great style, something between an S class and an A8, but all Aussie. I would love the caprice as my next car. Great features, great space and performance and now better economy. What more could you want? Some cramped import? I dont think so.
  • Matt J [reply]
    7 months ago 0 points
    Cramped import? Like what else competes against the Caprice? Skoda Supurb cramped? Audi A8 or S Class as you mentioned? 7 series LWB? Besides the prices for each.... the Caprice, actually Supurb would be worth more to get, worth least in other words, BETTER economy as well as perhaps a bit more space.
  • Holden S [reply]
    6 months ago 0 points
    The review is on the Statesman. If you dont like it thats great you can drive what ever non Australian car you like. If you had ever owed a Statesman and I do, you will find the reliability kickass on any import , the service of a BMW or audi etc shows the true price you pay.
  • Dave [reply]
    6 months ago 0 points
    Well said Holden S, I have a Statesman and I love the cabin space front and rear. There is no comparing a Statesman to a cramped Golf or ugly Skoda. The golf will never accomadate your family like a Statesman - full sized car. (who wants an overrated, gas guszzling SUV?) and who ever heard of Skoda? do they sell 100 cars a year? budget VW at best

Post new comment

Want to join the discussion, or start one off?

Before you can get started, you'll need to log in to the TMR comments system via one of the services below (TMR Hub, Facebook, OpenID). If you don't have an account with any of those three, we'd recommend a TMR Hub account, so that you can take advantage of the great features that are just around the corner.

OR OR

(optional)
(not shown to others)


To comment, you must be logged in via one of the above methods.