FPV GS Road Test Review

By Tony O'Kane | 
Dec 5, 2009
ShareThis

FPV GS Road Test Review

IT'S A GOOD TIME to be living in Australia.

Good point one: we now have access to many of the same efficient new-age diesels as our European counterparts.

Good point two: we can also choose from an increasing number of alternative drive vehicles coming - or soon to arrive - from Japan.

But, best point: we've still got a healthy choice of home-grown V8s priced well within the reach of the average buyer. We're spoiled for choice, and it's little things like this that make this country great.

Aside from the SS and XR8 offered by Holden and Ford, there’s the factory-tuned GT and R8 from FPV and HSV – and now there’s another.

2010_fpv_gs_020

The GS is FPV’s newest entrant to the Aussie muscle car market. It’s aimed squarely at buyers wanting FPV performance without the GT’s premium pricing.

The GS nomenclature will be familiar to older muscle car fans who remember the Grand Sport package offered on 1970s-era Falcons. FPV has deliberately revived the name for its new limited-edition budget model.

The GS sits at the bottom of the FPV range, and at $54,950 is only $7960 more than the Ford XR8. Only 250 examples will be built. The question is, of course, is it worth the extra outlay?

Styling

Look familiar? It should. Underneath the stripe package and GS graphics lies the standard body of the XR8, albeit dressed up with new wheels (actually the same 19-inch design used by the rest of the FPV’s FG-series models).

The visual presence of the GT’s raccoon-eyed bodykit may be absent, but the GS is no shrinking violet.

2010_fpv_gs_005

Attention-grabbing stripes stretch along each flank, and the prominent bonnet hump is accentuated by two strips emblazoned with “Boss 302”. (Boss being FPV’s pet name for its much-loved V8, and 302 being the power output of the GS in kilowatts.)

The endplates of the rear wing also advertise the kilowattage of the GS’s 5.4 litre V8, and stylised “GS” stickers adorn the rear doors and bootlid.

While the bumper mouldings and bonnet stamping are the same as the XR8’s, there is one key point of difference. Two chrome tailpipes exit from under the rear bumper, rather than the XR8’s single outlet.

For those who take note of such things, it’s the same dual exhaust system as that fitted to the GT.

2010_fpv_gs_012

Our test car was painted in Ford’s ‘Ego’ metallic – a dark grey hue that works well with the FG’s curves and is offset nicely by the silver graphics applied by FPV. We’ve got a hunch it would look even better in white though.

The GS looks great, to say the least, and it’s amazing how much a graphics package can enhance the (already good-looking) XR8’s bodywork.

Some may be turned off by the XR8-sourced exterior, but the understated GS definitely makes a far better ‘sleeper’ than the GT.

Interior

Like the rest of FPV’s sedan range, the interior of the GS is typical FG fare. There’s lots of high-quality black plastic, a beige headliner and silver trim pieces, all packaged up in the FG’s excellent cabin layout.

2010_fpv_gs_034_interior

Black cloth seats are standard, however our tester was equipped with the optional “Nudo Shadow” leather sports seats.

They’re supportive pews and comfortable for long cruises, but slimmer drivers will find them lacking in lateral ‘hold’ while carving up curvy roads.

2010_fpv_gs_041_interior

The driver's seat features power adjustment for squab height only, with manual controls for slide and backrest tilt. The passenger’s seat is entirely manual.

The steering wheel adjusts for reach and rake, and most won’t have any trouble fitting into the driver’s seat of the GS. However, the excellent power-adjustable pedal box that’s standard on the F6 E isn’t offered in the budget-priced GS.

2010_fpv_gs_042_interior

The rear seats are roomy and softly padded, but don’t count on them holding your passengers in place during any spirited cornering.

2010_fpv_gs_043_interior Still, with three people able to be carried across the rear bench in comfort, the task of justifying the purchase of a GS is made slightly easier for family-bound petrolheads.

A 60/40 split-fold rear seat allows long loads to be accommodated within the GS, and the boot is huge at 535 litres with the rear seats up. Like other FPV sedans, the GS is as practical as it is sporty.

Equipment and Features

Because of its budget positioning within FPV’s range, the spec list of the GS is a little thinner than the GT’s.

2010_fpv_gs_039_interior

iPod integration, Bluetooth telephony and dual-zone climate control are standard, as is FPV’s push-button starter (which, annoyingly, still requires the key to be turned in the ignition).

Sound is provided by a premium stereo with six-disc CD stacker and MP3 compatibility, and sound reproduction is good.


Comments

  • paddy [reply]
    8 months ago 0 points
    Nah not for me. No need for a detuned V8 when the F6 does just as well, this is a great car but really it will probably just end up in history books like hundreds of other great innovations
  • laurie [reply]
    8 months ago 0 points
    What's the point with 50-60 km/h speed limits in cities

    laurie
  • justin [reply]
    8 months ago 0 points
    Golly gosh Laurie, can't you think of something smarter to say.

    Name a new car on the oz market that can't do more than 60km/h.

    Some people like fast cars, some people like slow cars, some people like big cars and some people like small cars. Some people like all cars. Isn't it nice to have a choice with how to spend your money on transport?

    How do you get around? On a speed limited push-bike?
  • Required [reply]
    8 months ago 0 points
    Well maybe justin I was spoiled living in the N.T. for 30 yrs. where there were no speed limits them were the go 'old days wished I had these cars then

    laurie

    oh no push bike just walking or public transport ;-)
  • Falc [reply]
    8 months ago 0 points
    The TR6060 is now available in the HSV E2, but not in the SS.

    The ZF's lever is designed for the left hand market, that is why manual-mode is on the left.
  • Jess [reply]
    8 months ago 0 points
    No larger version of the pics available? That 3/4 rear shot of the GS looks amazing. I wish Ford would give the FG XR8 the twin exhaust rear treatment. As good as the auto is, I'd still take the manual.

    Geee it looks so good in Ego.
  • Nightshifter [reply]
    8 months ago 0 points
    I can't believe anyone would say it's good to to be living in Australia because of cars etc......

    For one, car prices here in Australia is so much higher than it is in US or Europe. Unless ur a billionaire and money is not a factor to you.
  • harry [reply]
    8 months ago 0 points
    please santa. put 1 in my xmass stocking me pleaseeeeeeeeeees
  • Shifter [reply]
    8 months ago 0 points
    That photo of the dials showing the average fuel consumption of 13.2 l / 100 k's is precisely why i wouldn't drive a beast like this, it will kill you every time you frequently frequent the bowser. My Golf TDi gets average under 5 litres / 100k's, sometimes down to average 4.3 on highway trips. i love not having to fill up every couple of days.
  • Will [reply]
    8 months ago 0 points
    Neo Lutzian rubbish. .
  • haha [reply]
    8 months ago 0 points
    shifter, a golf TDi and FPV GS are not fair, equal comparisons.

    It all depends on driving style, sometimes my ralliart lancer gets 9L/100km other times it's around 14L/100km

    FG series is an elegant ford and why not have this model as another choice for customers, I'm sure they'll sell-out :)
  • Andy D [reply]
    8 months ago 0 points
    The 13.2L average is pretty good, but of course it cannot be compared to the TDI Golf. Well the Golf, dont get me wrong is a good car but it aint no V8.

    The GS seems to be good value for money if your looking for a performance sedan.
  • fourcam89 [reply]
    7 months ago 0 points
    Granted cars are much cheaper in the U.S. but there is also nothing produced like the GS or the remainder of the FPV line. I was so desperate for something somewhat simular to this concept with 4 wheel independant suspention that before the Mustang here in the U.S. was finally produced with it, I was forced to build my own . Using a 89SC Thunderbird and converting the brake system,Vortec forced 4.6 and T5 from a 97 Cobra into the SC. Using all the aluminum conponents for the rear suspention of a MKVIII Lincoln to rid the SC of all the stamped steel. None of this concept was available to this cheaper U.S.market. The thought,design and testing that is nessisary to produce something of this nature not only for one self, but in a thoroughly tested production run capable of enduring the public's deserning eye, let alone abuse that they all more or less recieve from time to time is well beyond a persons concept of what it really entails to become a reality. And in this day and age, thought =testing=time=$$$

Post new comment

Want to join the discussion, or start one off?

Before you can get started, you'll need to log in to the TMR comments system via one of the services below (TMR Hub, Facebook, OpenID). If you don't have an account with any of those three, we'd recommend a TMR Hub account, so that you can take advantage of the great features that are just around the corner.

OR OR

(optional)
(not shown to others)


To comment, you must be logged in via one of the above methods.