Global Green Car Challenge: The Winners

Nov 5, 2009
ShareThis

THE GLOBAL GREEN CAR Challenge has come to a close, with more than a few carmakers claiming victories and company records.

Based on best percentage improvement over the vehicle's official fuel consumption figures, the event's surprise result came from the HSV Maloo, averaging 7.74 l/100km. The Maloo's official fuel consumption figure is 15.1 l/100km.

Officially, the Global Green Car Challenge separated entrants into categories dependent on vehicle type and size, with the Maloo winning the Production Class Ute/Light Truck category.

Another standout performance came from the Suzuki Alto, more than halving its official 4.8 l/100km rating by achieving 2.0 l/100km - in Adelaide's CBD.

Class - Winner

  • Production Class Small Car Diesel - Ford Fiesta ECOnetic

    Official: 3.7 l/100km  - Result: 2.9 l/100km

  • Production Class Small Car Petrol - Suzuki Alto GLX

    Official: 4.8 l/100km - Result: 2.0 l/100km

  • Production Class Ute/Light Truck - HSV Maloo Ute

    Official: 15.1 l/100km - Result: 7.74 l/100km

  • Production Class Large Car Petrol - Ford Falcon XR6 Turbo

    Official: 11.7 l/100km - Result: 6.7 l/100km

  • Production Class Large Car Diesel - Skoda Superb

    Official: 5.4 l/100km - Result: 4.59 l/100km

  • Production Class Medium/ Off Road - Hyundai Santa Fe SLX

    Official: 6.7 l/100km - Result: 5.1 l/100km

  • Production Class 2 seat Electric - Tesla

    501km on one charge. Previous record: 430km

2010_hyundai_santa-fe_update_first-drive-review_tony_06

MINI's Cooper D entries - three in total - achieved a best of 3.42 l/100km, bettering its official rating of 3.9 l/100km. The Cooper D is one of the most fuel efficient cars available in Australia.

The 2010 Kia Sorento, sharing the same R-2.2 diesel powering the Santa Fe entries, achieved a figure just shy of its Hyundai sibling - 5.17 l/100km - bettering its official fuel consumption figure of 6.7 l/100km.

Holden's SIDI equipped VE Sportwagon, with an official fuel consumption figure of 9.3 l/100km, achieved a result of 6.48 l/100km.


Comments

  • Eurothusiast [reply]
    10 months ago 0 points
    It's a shame most of the results shown here are skewed by the fact that the claimed is a combination cycle, while the returns are predominantly highway kilometers with "hypermiling" thrown in.
  • paddy [reply]
    10 months ago 0 points
    The fact is, people don't realise it's a mix. Most housewives and martians would think that cars drink the same amount of petrol no matter what stress the engine is in :)

    Nonetheless it's good to know how capable these cars are in milechewing mode :)
  • Mick [reply]
    10 months ago 0 points
    If you live in Darwin and work in Adelaide and want to drive to work, this is must reading. Otherwise forget it. LOL

Post new comment

Want to join the discussion, or start one off?

Before you can get started, you'll need to log in to the TMR comments system via one of the services below (TMR Hub, Facebook, OpenID). If you don't have an account with any of those three, we'd recommend a TMR Hub account, so that you can take advantage of the great features that are just around the corner.

OR OR

(optional)
(not shown to others)


To comment, you must be logged in via one of the above methods.