Get the best price on a new car
2010 MN Triton GLX-R And GL-R First Drive Review
IT'S GRUNTIER, is considerably more refined, uses less fuel, has a longer and larger cargo tub, and is more comfortable at the wheel than the outgoing 3.2 litre turbo-diesel ML Triton.
So, Triton enthusiasts, you can stop panicking now. The new MY10 MN Triton is better. It’s as simple as that.
And don’t get all het up about the downsizing of the diesel up front – down from 3.2 litres to 2.5. The new 4D56 HP (for ‘high-power’) unit is a cracker. Sure, it’s smaller; but it’s a much smoother, quieter and lustier piece of work.
Its 131kW of power is class-leading; and the 400Nm (in manual versions) it produces at just 2000rpm, is only shaded by the Navara’s 403Nm. That’s a gain of 11 percent in power and 17 percent in torque outputs over the previous 4M41 3.2 litre diesel engine.
(Automatic variants get similar power but a lower 350Nm of torque.)
Those numbers work very well on the road and even better in the rough. Importantly, if you are considering a Triton for work duties – you know, concrete mixer, three lard-arses and a cubit of mud in the tray – or your boat has the dimensions and subtlety of a bulk ore carrier, the MN Triton also has improved towing capacity.
By how much? Up to 2.7 tonne (braked) for the dual-cab pickups, and 3.0 tonne (braked) for cab-chassis models.
With standard driver and front passenger SRS airbags, and stability control and side and curtain airbags available on diesel dual-cab models, the MN Triton is also safer.
We took two of the new models out of Byron Bay for a stint of highway, gravel road and off-road driving; the new GL-R manual for the on-road sections, and the GLX-R in automatic into the rough.
We’ll talk about the fight in the dog shortly (and the news is encouraging), but what’s the MN Triton got – inside and out – and where has it been improved?
The Drive
It’s no secret (read through our earlier reviews): we like the way the Triton drives here at TMR.
The previous ML model, in our view, led the segment for its superior mix of on-road comfort and off-road capability. Its replacement, the MN, is better again – or so it would seem after this first drive.
Of course, a longer test across a wider range of driving conditions and surfaces will tell the tale (the test vehicles were also carrying a little ballast in the tub, arguably to better emulate real-world driving conditions).
But, on first impressions, the MN would appear to have raised the bar for the versatile workhorse cum family transport commercial sector.
The GL-R we had for the highway and gravel roads leg proved again just how well Mitsubishi sets up a ‘compromise’ suspension. When you’re buying a 4x4 work-ute with real off-road capability, you probably prefer not have your eyeballs shaken out of your head whenever you point it at the tarmac. Probably.
Some can be a tad wearing to live with on this score, but not the Triton. It’s quite at home on the highway and surprisingly well-balanced and easy to live with even on secondary roads.
Its double wishbone front suspension and leaf-spring rear with solid axle works better than a bald description of its engineering might suggest (it’s a well-worn and well-proven combo).
The Triton though manages to do it better than most. The suspension tuning provides good initial compliance, allowing the suspension to ‘soak-up’ road imperfections, while being firm enough to carry nearly a tonne in the tray (972kg to be exact) without scraping along the road on its belly.
Relative to its light commercial sector, it is quite free of jarring over poor roads and broken bitumen. It is also commendably quiet with very little wind noise and road roar finding its way into the cabin – the Triton is better, in fact, than the new Outlander on the road roar front.
It’s the gutsy 4D56 2.5 litre HP diesel however that most transforms the drive.
The evident (and sometimes wearing) diesel rattle of the older 4M41 3.2 litre unit is much improved with the 2.5 litre in the new model. At the wheel it is all-but absent. On road, and when working, there is just a nice rounded ‘hum’ accompanying things which is neither intrusive nor unpleasant.
Also helping things is the smooth-shifting and nicely weighted five-speed manual transmission we had in the GL-R for the road legs of the trip. The clutch action is a little long, but the ratios are well suited to the characteristics of the engine and the right gear falls nicely to hand when rowing the MN along.
It is quite car-like and well-mannered on the road, and it’s only when pushing through turns or on undulating secondary roads that you’re reminded of the MN’s commercial underpinning.
Sure, it’s a high-riding ute so it’s not designed for hunting down the apexes. But, provided you make allowances for the inevitable understeer, it is surprisingly stable and can be rowed along with confidence.
Even over the worst stretches, you wouldn’t describe it as harsh or unforgiving. But the quality is in the breeding. From the day the first Pajero arrived twenty-five plus years ago, Mitsubishi has always managed the highway and off-road compromise better than most.
For the off-road work, we swapped into the GLX-R automatic. With Mitsubishi’s ‘Super Select’ 4WD system below, diff-lock and ample torque underfoot, the GLX-R made short work of things in the rough.
While the tracks were dry, and would have presented more of a challenge to the Bridgestone Dueler boots had there been mud underfoot, the Triton had no trouble with the deeply rutted steep climbs and descents.
The Super Select system is little short of brilliant. By directing traction front and back to where it can be used, it allows you to tackle things steadily, to simply rely on the 400Nm of torque underfoot and to ‘wind’ your way up and over obstacles.
We’ve come to trust and appreciate the ML over even the toughest off-road tracks. On the basis of this first drive, the MN would appear to have lost none of its predecessor’s ability as a hard-working and almost effortlessly capable 4x4.
The Verdict
The new MN Triton is, in our view, still class leader in the dual-cab 4x4 segment. Its combination of on-road compliance and comfort, coupled with workhorse robustness and genuine off-road capability, tip the scales its way.
Others do some things better, sure, but for sheer versatility and all-round capability, the Triton makes very appealing buying.
Now with a longer tray bed, a stronger but more refined and fuel-efficient diesel, plus some noticeable interior and exterior refinements, the MN is an improved car in nearly every way over the ML.
For those who may have been worried that the move to the smaller diesel would be a retrograde step for Mitsubishi, the reality would appear to be otherwise.
So, whether you have work, play or family duties in mind, put the MN Triton on the list for consideration.
You will likely find, as we have, that sequels can sometimes be better than the original.
The Drive
It’s no secret (read through our earlier reviews): we like the way the Triton drives here at TMR.
The previous ML model, in our view, led the segment for its superior mix of on-road comfort and off-road capability. Its replacement, the MN, is better again – or so it would seem after this first drive.
Of course, a longer test across a wider range of driving conditions and surfaces will tell the tale (the test vehicles were also carrying a little ballast in the tub, arguably to better emulate real-world driving conditions).
But, on first impressions, the MN would appear to have raised the bar for the versatile workhorse cum family transport commercial sector.
The GL-R we had for the highway and gravel roads leg proved again just how well Mitsubishi sets up a ‘compromise’ suspension. When you’re buying a 4x4 work-ute with real off-road capability, you probably prefer not have your eyeballs shaken out of your head whenever you point it at the tarmac. Probably.
Some can be a tad wearing to live with on this score, but not the Triton. It’s quite at home on the highway and surprisingly well-balanced and easy to live with even on secondary roads.
Its double wishbone front suspension and leaf-spring rear with solid axle works better than a bald description of its engineering might suggest (it’s a well-worn and well-proven combo).
The Triton though manages to do it better than most. The suspension tuning provides good initial compliance, allowing the suspension to ‘soak-up’ road imperfections, while being firm enough to carry nearly a tonne in the tray (972kg to be exact) without scraping along the road on its belly.
Relative to its light commercial sector, it is quite free of jarring over poor roads and broken bitumen. It is also commendably quiet with very little wind noise and road roar finding its way into the cabin – the Triton is better, in fact, than the new Outlander on the road roar front.
It’s the gutsy 4D56 2.5 litre HP diesel however that most transforms the drive.
The evident (and sometimes wearing) diesel rattle of the older 4M41 3.2 litre unit is much improved with the 2.5 litre in the new model. At the wheel it is all-but absent. On road, and when working, there is just a nice rounded ‘hum’ accompanying things which is neither intrusive nor unpleasant.
Also helping things is the smooth-shifting and nicely weighted five-speed manual transmission we had in the GL-R for the road legs of the trip. The clutch action is a little long, but the ratios are well suited to the characteristics of the engine and the right gear falls nicely to hand when rowing the MN along.
It is quite car-like and well-mannered on the road, and it’s only when pushing through turns or on undulating secondary roads that you’re reminded of the MN’s commercial underpinning.
Sure, it’s a high-riding ute so it’s not designed for hunting down the apexes. But, provided you make allowances for the inevitable understeer, it is surprisingly stable and can be rowed along with confidence.
Even over the worst stretches, you wouldn’t describe it as harsh or unforgiving. But the quality is in the breeding. From the day the first Pajero arrived twenty-five plus years ago, Mitsubishi has always managed the highway and off-road compromise better than most.
For the off-road work, we swapped into the GLX-R automatic. With Mitsubishi’s ‘Super Select’ 4WD system below, diff-lock and ample torque underfoot, the GLX-R made short work of things in the rough.
While the tracks were dry, and would have presented more of a challenge to the Bridgestone Dueler boots had there been mud underfoot, the Triton had no trouble with the deeply rutted steep climbs and descents.
The Super Select system is little short of brilliant. By directing traction front and back to where it can be used, it allows you to tackle things steadily, to simply rely on the 400Nm of torque underfoot and to ‘wind’ your way up and over obstacles.
We’ve come to trust and appreciate the ML over even the toughest off-road tracks. On the basis of this first drive, the MN would appear to have lost none of its predecessor’s ability as a hard-working and almost effortlessly capable 4x4.
Verdict
The new MN Triton is, in our view, still class leader in the dual-cab 4x4 segment. Its combination of on-road compliance and comfort, coupled with workhorse robustness and genuine off-road capability, tip the scales its way.
Others do some things better, sure, but for sheer versatility and all-round capability, the Triton makes very appealing buying.
Now with a longer tray bed, a stronger but more refined and fuel-efficient diesel, plus some noticeable interior and exterior refinements, the MN is an improved car in nearly every way over the ML.
For those who may have been worried that the move to the smaller diesel would be a retrograde step for Mitsubishi, the reality would appear to be otherwise.
So, whether you have work, play or family duties in mind, put the MN Triton on the list for consideration.
You will likely find, as we have, that sequels can sometimes be better than the original.
Get the best price on a new car
Filed under: review, Mitsubishi, diesel, ute, 4wd, mitsubishi triton, commercial, crew cab, Mitsubishi Triton GLX-R, family, 4cyl, mitsubishi triton gl-r



























Leave a comment:
Or use the form below, without registering.
4 years ago
How did the 4D56HP go with turbo lag and low down response, is it as good as the old 4M41?
4 years ago
4 years ago
I've been ready to buy in this segment for about 6 months and with two young kids you simply cannot go past the saftey featuresmof the new MN. It's great to see that it alo rates highly in engine, ride and I must say an improved look - or maybe it has just grown on me over time! Now, the big decision - what colour to buy!
4 years ago
5 months ago
4 years ago
Thanks
Rob
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
cheers
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
3 years ago
3 years ago
Also can anyone reccommend a decent GPS model? We wanted one that sits on top of the dash in the middle, one that's good for camping and clear and simle to use. Any ideas?
Thanks
3 years ago
I have decided on all white, i think will look good and clean in white with the mags, alloy sports & nudge bars.
47K Drive away - End of Jan delivery.
Regards Greg
3 years ago
3 years ago
Paid $53000 on Sunshine Coast, QLD Drive away for White GLX-R in Auto with Diff lock, polished aluminium tray, polished head board bar and over cab rack, and towbar kit. Can't wait, looking to fit a Carputer with 7" LCD ASAP.
3 years ago
3 years ago
3 years ago
3 years ago
3 years ago
I am looking at the highline canopy. How deep is it at the highest part and at the front. (either to the uteliner bottom or the metal floor)
the tomtoms are generally the easiest and most accurate. The 930 is probably the best but if you want to spend less the 720 or 730 or even the one excel are really good. Dependp
s on if you play music etc.
Thanks Bunyip
3 years ago
3 years ago
What I wanted to say was we will be getting our new Triton within the next couple of weeks - Can't Wait!!! So when it arrive I would be happy to post those measurments through if it's not too late. We do have the ute liner as well.
We opted for the highline as it offers slightly more hight within the cab then the other genuine Triton cabs avail, so it was an easy decision for us. We felt that getting the highline cab would somewhat compensate a little for any space taken from the ute liner. We've seen a few on the road and they still look great
Hope this info was in some way helpful
Ros
3 years ago
3 years ago
3 years ago
3 years ago
take it for a drive and see for yourself!
3 years ago
I was told that the triton is noisy when driving? What are your thoughts?
3 years ago
3 years ago
i find at 110 - 120 ks the vehicle seems to get a slight surge thing happening, it,s likethe units trying to keep the speed to accurate,every second, or is this a typical tubo diesel problem?
i can,t be a lack of power as its easy to put your foot on the accelerator and speed up.
3 years ago
Other than that, GLX-R comes with enough stuff you don't need to do much else to it, check out www.newtriton.net for enthusiasts into the vehicle and a few good discussions on mods etc.
3 years ago
3 years ago
Thanks to discostu,
Looking closely at the Triton GLX-R with added options but went to a dealership yesterday and he hit me up full tilt prices - who does the best/good deals as i will deal with whom is a little fair dinkum - it will be fleet as i will be a Novated Lease
3 years ago
just go to three dealers and get three prices - tell em whoever
gives you the best price wins - then watch em fight over each other hehe
or if ur leasing some lease companies can do the negotiations for you or have a preferred dealership they work with - ether way you should come out pretty good
3 years ago
3 years ago
3 years ago
One thing you learn when you move to the NT is you pay twice as much for somthing thats not quite what you want. I wanted a GLX and was going to put all the 4x4 gear and after market rims and tyres on it. I wanted the Diff lock and Active stab and Traction control, The GLR and more so the GLXR have to much flash crap i did not want, use or need. The dealer could not get one and said i would have better chance with an GLR or GLXR i went GLR as it still has the head board to tie tall loads in. I wanted a ute for work, pulling a boat off the beaten track to remote fishing spots, and a nice safe drive for the wife and kids. The GLR should cover that. I know i could have got one cheaper on the east coast but its at least $2000 to get one up hear and the dints and spratches are free, trust me i have been through that one.
PS only just got ABN
3 years ago
3 years ago
Can someone plz let me know if this is a reasonable price or bit more than they would pay
3 years ago
Finally our new 2010 MN GLR Triton has arrived! Diesel 4x4, Cool silver, tinted windows, steel bullbar, tow bar, hightop canopy & tray liner.
Very Impressed with the presentation & the room inside of the Hight top Canopy. Measurments inside hightop canopy with tray liner.
Approx measuements
Length 1.48m
Width 1.44m
Height .97m
Will be buying a reversing camera.
Ute is smooth to change gears, seats are comfy & stereo is amazing for a standard stereo! 2nd gear has great power, much better then 1st gear.
We have to travel over the 'rangers' alot here which is 15 minutes of very windy road and it handled it like a breeze, we felt comfortable and in control around each sharp corner.
3 years ago
Monday put my money down for a Triton GLR. With canopy,liner,weathershields and headlight protectors and usual dealer and government charges came to around $54,000. Trade in of 2008 Ford Escape ($19000) and Dealers discount of $7000, bought the changeover figure to $28,000. Assume that is reasonable.
Everything sounded so good and reviews were positive (Outlander 4WD of the year). It was the room in the back seats that sold me, and the chance to be able to travel without having to put seats down for more storage room.
Only real disappointment was no reading lights/sunglass holder-this is replaced with a puny digital clock.
Cant wait to get into this vehicle - delivery expected next week.
Hope to travel the Gibb River road next year on our second round Australia trip.
Cheers.
3 years ago
Thank you for your help!!
3 years ago
3 years ago
Carbon accumulation seems a very serious problem for mitsubishi common rail diesels. Wynns have a solvent you add to fuel or direct through air intake. Is this a solution or another gim***? As owners should we get rid of these vehicles before the engines are crippled?
3 years ago
3 years ago
2 years ago