2009 Nissan 370Z First Test Drive

header2

The new 370Z. It’s here, it’s as good as the hype suggests, it’s a blast at the wheel, and you can buy one now. And because I’m a lucky dog, I’ve driven it.

Lighter, shorter, lower and more powerful, the new Zed is a quantum advance over the out-going model. It is also blisteringly fast and superbly balanced. Almost everywhere you look at the new car, the shortcomings in the old have been addressed and improved.

On our first test drive through and beyond the Adelaide hills, we put it through its paces. Among the cold black hearts of the motoring press Nissan had assembled to pass judgment, the verdict was all-but unanimous - the new 370Z is a superb new contender in the sports coupe segment.

If you liked the old Zed, you will love the new one. And if your first experience of Zed-motoring is at the wheel of the 370, you’ll be asking yourself “how long has this been going on?”

So, where is it better (besides everywhere), and why will you like it?

More than just styling changes

2009 Nissan 370Z Z34

First off, it looks better. There is a slightly ‘hawkish’ line to the long bonnet and the kicked-up hip-line over the raised haunches - a nod to the styling of the original 240Z - adds athleticism to the lines at the rear.

So too the swooping line of the roof, which now has its highest point at the top of the windscreen. Up front, the ‘arrow-head’ lights (which I’d had reservations about when I first set eyes on net images) and the gaping fanged maw, give it real presence on the road.

2009 Nissan 370Z Z34

It would be hard to say it’s beautiful; it looks what it is - a well-crafted hammer.

Visibly smaller and ‘lighter’ on its wheels than the 350Z, the new car looks more the athletic road warrior than the highway tourer. And it turns heads everywhere. Heading back to Adelaide, the striking new colours of a wolf-pack of Zeds slinking along in file had the kids pouring out of school in the mid-afternoon absolutely gaping.

But there is more to the exterior than just styling changes. The bonnet, doors and tailgate are aluminium: alone giving a weight-saving of 32kg. Similarly, lighter materials have been used throughout the body structure and suspension underpinnings to save around 100kg overall. (That’s like having one less chunky passenger in the car, every time you drive.)

2009 Nissan 370Z Z34

In keeping with the old, and evident in the images, the engine is mounted far back in the chassis, giving a 53 to 47 percent front-to-rear weight distribution.

But the new 370Z sits on a shorter wheelbase (now 2550mm) than the outgoing 350Z - 100mm, or 10 centimetres, have been taken from behind the hip-point of the driver and the rear axle - and it has a wider front track (15mm) and wider rear (50mm). It has also had 8mm shaved off the height and the seats are 10mm closer to the ground.

the new car looks more the athletic road warrior than the highway tourer.

Under the whip, the shorter wider wheelbase and lower centre of gravity translates into noticeably superior handling.

The work bench

The interior was perhaps the Achilles heel of the 350Z, particularly of the first models to arrive. It certainly attracted the severest criticism. In the new 370Z, there are no such worries - things inside have been vastly improved.

Gone are the tacky plastics and strange little cubby-holes. In their place now a nicely-designed centre console (with sat nav as standard fitting) and a quality soft-feel dash. There are soft suede trims on the doors, heated seats, well laid-out controls and brushed metal trims and highlights.

2009 Nissan 370Z Z34

The three-cell instrument panel has larger, more easily read guages, and there is a cohesiveness to the way the interior elements work.

The flattened ‘kidney-shaped’ wheel feels just right: soft to the feel, neither too fat nor too thin. And the electric seats - leaning to soft but infinitely variable and nicely shaped for my frame - are trimmed in a non-slip leather for when things are getting (ahem) ‘exciting’ on a mountain road.

The 370Z also comes loaded: there are illuminated audio and telephone remote controls - and cruise control - on the steering wheel; Bluetooth phone connectivity is standard; there is also a Bose six-CD with radio (natch) and MP3 capability. And, to get things really hopping when you cruise through the ‘hood, there are speakers everywhere and two 115mm woofers in a 7.7 litre ported enclosure.

2009 Nissan 370Z Z34

Aside from the big step-up in quality, the second-most noticable change inside is that the 350Z’s slightly daft (from a usability point of view) strut brace that prevented you from carrying anything but a tooth brush, your pet rat and a packet of exotic prophylactics in the back, is gone.

Well, not completely gone, the brace now sits behind the seats, but the rear hatch of the 370Z offers a clear cargo area that’s good enough for two golf bags Nissan informs us.

2009 Nissan 370Z Z34

Some of the plastic fit back here is not up to the high standards of the rest of the interior, but, overall, for general fit and finish, for design ergonomics and for quality of materials, there is little to find fault with. Inside, the 370Z feels and works the way you’d expect a premium car to feel.

And as a work-bench for the serious driver, it is a very nice place to be.

Comments

Click here to jump to Add Comment box

User Pic

How do you get a picture next to your name?
Get a Gravatar. Click here to find out more.

I recall the big issue they had with the original 350z was the really hard ride, and the track edition was even worse.

The 370z looks much better inside and out and from the sounds of this review is a well executed package.

Now, just have to save up the 68 large. Thats the only issue in my book, seems like a lot. You get what you pay for I guess.

Fantastic car Nissan! Having owned a 280zx reading this article on this beast of a car makes me both jealous and very envious of anyone getting their hands on such a fine specimen of the automotive world! Nissan number 1…..

Pity Oz taxes push this car out of the reach of Mr Average enthusiast, unlike the US market where it’s the people’s performance car. As an owner of Track the ‘bone jarring’ ride of the earlier models is a bit of beat up. The visual similarities between the two models has me remaining perfectly satisfied mine is not drastically dated.

I suppose a sports car’s suspension would seem “bone jarring” to a country used to driving water beds…

gay rims

As the owner of a 35th Anniversary Track Coupe (2005) I have modified the suspension on my beast to be lower and much firmer. With 35 series tyres on 19″ rims and anti-sway bars the size of telegraph polls, my car is in another world when it comes to “firm”. I really don’t understand all the commentry on how the earlier Zs were too harsh.

I don’t much like the look of the new Z but I DO like the new interior and gadgetry. I’ll be keeping my rig just a bit longer I think.

I have owned a 350z for the last four years. As soon as the dealer got the 370z in and one drive around a bit, I traded in the 350 on the 370. Totally awesome handling car.

I really like the Nismo. However, the picture posted above of the convertible hardly shows what the car looks like. From other pictures I’ve seen, it seems the least changed from the 350Z of all the new models.

I was the owner of a 4 year old 350z with 30,000k on the clock - Fantastic car but one test drive of the 370z and signed up on the spot. Still prefer the 350 looks but the 370 power, handling and equipment level leaves the 350 for dead.

Leave a Comment